Consulting · DevOps Enablement
DevOps Enablement
Releases are manual, infrequent and nervous. Security testing happens at the end, or at the audit. Every team has built a different pipeline, and none of them produces evidence. [Draft copy]
The problem
Security at the end of the pipeline is security you cannot afford to act on.
When a scan runs the week before release, every finding is expensive: the code is written, the date is fixed, and the honest options are ship with the risk or move the date. So findings get accepted, and the register of accepted risks becomes the thing the auditor reads.
Meanwhile each team has assembled its own pipeline from whatever was to hand. There is no common definition of what must pass before something reaches production, and no traceability from a change request to the artefact actually running.
What enterprise-grade looks like here
The pipeline is the control, not the document describing it.
Enterprise-grade delivery means the checks are in the pipeline and they fail the build. Separation of duties is enforced by who can approve a deployment, not by a policy PDF. Artefacts are signed and traceable, so what is running in production can be tied back to the commit and the approval that put it there.
Security moves to where it is cheap: a developer sees the finding in the merge request, minutes after writing the line, while changing it costs nothing. That is the whole of shift-left, and it is an economic argument rather than a philosophical one.
This framing repeats on every capability page. It is the differentiator, and it reads consistently across all of them (§9 T3).
What we do
Five moves, in this order.
-
Deploy and structure GitLab
Self-managed or SaaS, with the group and project structure, runner topology and access model mapped to how your organisation is actually governed.
-
Build reference pipelines
Build, test, artefact signing, environment promotion and approval gates — as templates your teams inherit rather than copy, so a fix lands everywhere.
-
Shift security left, and make it blocking
SAST, dependency and container scanning, secret detection and infrastructure-as-code scanning, running in the merge request with policies that fail the build at a threshold you set.
-
Automate the environments
Infrastructure as code, reproducible environment provisioning and release automation, so a rollback is a command rather than an incident.
-
Enable the team, then leave
Your engineers run it. We pair until they do, and the Academy course exists for the people who join afterwards.
[Draft copy]
What you end up owning
Documents and configuration, not a dependency.
| Deliverable | Owned by |
|---|---|
| A configured GitLab estate matching your governance | Platform team |
| Inheritable reference pipeline templates | Engineering |
| DevSecOps policy set and scan thresholds | Security and engineering |
| Infrastructure-as-code modules and environment definitions | Platform team |
| Release evidence produced automatically per deployment | Risk & compliance |
[Draft copy]
Tell us what you are being asked to prove.
Bring the audit finding, the questionnaire or the release you are nervous about.
Start a conversation